Research

This is the list of the articles, books and websites I read while completing my research. It's organized alphabetically. You can view article summaries by searching titles with Google Scholar. Citations are in APA format.

***

• Abel, M. H., & Watters, H. (2005). Attributions of guilt and punishment as functions of physical attractiveness and smiling. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 687-702.
• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1995a). Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in preadolescent. Social Psychology Quarterly 58(3), 145-162.
• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1995b). Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity. Saint John, NB: Rutgers University Press.
• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1996). Preadolescent clique stratification and the hierarchy of identity. Sociological Inquiry, 66(2), 111-142.
• Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J. & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169-187.
• Andersen, S. M., & Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 74-86.
• Anonymous (2010). Social life in medical school. Student doctor network forums. Retrieved April 16th 2011 from http://forums.studentdoctor.net/archive/index.php/t-741177.html
• Banerjee, R. (2002). Audience effects on self-presentation in childhood. Social Development, 11(4), 487-507.
• Barr, A., Bryan, A. & Kenrick, D. (2002). Sexual peak: Socially shared cognitions about desire frequency, satisfaction in men and women. Personal Relationships, 9, 287-299.
• Bennett, M., & Yeeles, C. (1990). Children‘s understanding of the self-presentational strategies of ingratiation and self-promotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 455–461.
• Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain research Reviews, 28(3), 309-369.
• Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E. & Aldridge, J. W. (2009). Dissecting components of reward: 'liking', 'wanting', and learning. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 9(1), 65-73.
• Bierhoff, H. W. (1989) Person perception and attribution. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
• Boyatzis, C. J., Baloff, P. & Durieux, C. (1998). Effects of perceived attractiveness and academic success on early adolescent peer popularity. The Journal or Genetic Psychology, 159(3), 337-344.
• Brendgen, M. & Little, T. D. (2000). Rejected children and their friends: A shared evaluation of friendship quality? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46 (1), 45-70.
• Brundage, L. E., Derlega, V. J., & Cash, T. F. (1977). The effects of physical attractiveness and need for approval on self-disclosure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 63-66.
• Bukowski, W. M. & Pizzamiglio, M. T., Newcomb, A. F. & Hoza, B. (1996). Popularity as an affordance for friendship: The link between group and dyadic experience. Social Development, 5(2), 189-202.
• Byrne, D. & Griffit, W. (1973). Interpersonal attraction. Annual Review of Psychology, 24, 317-336.
• Caplan, C. (2010). Bullying girls in and out of cliques. In S. R. Gunton (Ed.), Cliques (pp. 17-32). Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press.
• Carnegie, D. (1937). How to win friends and influence people. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
• Cillessen, A. H. N. (2011). Toward a theory of popularity. In A. H., Cillessen & D. Schwartz, L. Mayeux, (Eds.), Popularity in the Peer System (pp. 273-299). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.
• Cillessen, A. H. N. & Mayeux, M. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147-163.
• Closson, L. M. (2008). Status and gender differences in early Adolescents‘ descriptions of popularity. Social Development 18(2), 412-426.
• Cloutier, J., Heatherton, T. F., Whalen, P. J. & Kelley, W. M. (2008). Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 941-91.
• Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
• DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behaviour and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 203-243.
• Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H., Lindenberg, S. & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(4), 942-958.
• Dodge, K. A., Schlundt, D. C., Schocken, I., Delugach, J. D. (1983). Social competence and children's sociometric status: The role of peer group entry strategies. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-336.
• Dollinger, S. J. (2002). Physical attractiveness, social connectedness, and individuality: An autophotographic study. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 25-32.
• Dunn, M. J. & Searle, R. (2010). Effects of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings. The British Journal of Psychology, 101, 69-80.
• Dunnington, M. H. (1957). Behavioural differences in sociometric status groups in a nursery school. Child Development, 25, 103-111.
• Erwin, P, G. (1981). The role of attitudinal similarity and perceived acceptance evaluation in interpersonal attraction. The Journal of Psychology, 109, 133-136.
• Fisher, H. (2000). Lust, attraction, attachment: Biology and evolution of the three primary emotion systems for mating, reproduction and parenting. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25(1), 96-105.
• Fisher, H. (1993). Anatomy of Love: A natural history or monogamy, adultery, and divorce. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
• Fisher, H., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, M. & Brown, L. L. (2002). Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 31(5), 413-419.
• Flora, C. (2004). The once over: Can you trust first impressions? Psychology Today.com. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200407/the-once-over?page=2
• Garcia, S., Stinson, L., Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V. & Briggs, S. R. (1991). Shyness and physical attractiveness in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 35-49.
• Gross, A. E. & Crofton, C. (1977). What is good is beautiful. Sociometry, 40(1), 85-90.
• Hay, I. & Ashman, A. F. (2003). The development of adolescents‘ emotional stability and general self-concept: The interplay of parents, peers, and gender. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 50, 77–91.
• Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431-462.
• Horton, R. S. (2003). Similarity and attractiveness in social perception: Differentiating between biases for the self and the beautiful. Self and Identity, 2, 137-152.
• Howe, C. (2010). Peer Groups and Children’s Development. Malde, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Kleck, R. E., Richardson , S. A. & Ronald, L. (1974). Physical appearance cues and interpersonal attraction in children. Child Development, 45, 305-310.
• Kosir, K. & Pecjak, S. (2005). Sociometry as a method for investigation peer relationships: What does it really measure? Educational Research, 47(1), 127-144.
• Kunin, C. C. & Rodin, M. J. (1982). The interactive effects of counsellor gender, physical attractiveness and status on client self-disclosure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 84-90.
• LaFontana, K. M. & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children‘s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647.
• LaFontana, K. M., Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130-147.
• LaFreniere, P. & Charlesworth, W. R. (1983). Dominance, attention, and affiliation in a preschool group: A nine-month longitudinal study. Ethology and Sociobilogy, 4(2), 55–67.
• Lemay, E. P., Clark, M. S. & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (3), 339-353.
• Levine, S. P. & Feldman, R. S. (1997). Self-presentational goals, self-monitoring, and nonverbal behaviour. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 79(4), 505-518.
• Levinger, G. (1974). A three-level approach to attraction: Toward an understanding of Pair Relatedness. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 99-120). New York, NY: Academic Press.
• Lindstrom, W. A. & Lease, M. A. (2005). The role of athlete as contributor to peer status in school-age and adolescent females in the United States: From pre-title IX to 2000 and beyond. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 223-244.
• McCall, G. J. (1974). A symbolic interactionist approach to attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 217-231). New York, NY: Academic Press.
• McCall, M. (1997). The effects of physical attractiveness on gaining access to alcohol: When social policy meets social decision making. Addiction, 92, 597-600.
• Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
• Mims, P. R., Hartnett, J. J. & Nay, W. R. (1975). Interpersonal attraction and help volunteering as a function of physical attractiveness. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 89, 125-131.
• Moore, M. M. (2010). Human nonverbal courtship behaviour—A brief historical review. Journal of Sex Research, 47(2-3), 171-180.
• Newcomb, A. F. & Bagwell, C. L. (2009). Children's friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306-347.
• Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M. & Pattee, L. (1993). Children‘s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, Neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
• Principe, C. P. & Langlois, J. H. (2011). Faces differing in attractiveness elicit corresponding affective responses. Cognition and emotion, 25(1), 140-148.
• Quereshi, M. Y. & Kay, J. P. (1986). Physical attractiveness, age, and sex as determinants of reactions to resumes. Social Behaviour & Personality, 14, 103-112.
• Rall, M., Greenspan, A. & Neidich, E. (1984). Reactions to eye contact initiated by physically attractive and unattractive men and women. Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 103-109.
• Rosen, L. H. & Underwood, M. K. (2010). Facial attractiveness as a moderator of the association between social and physical aggression and popularity in adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 313–333.
• Rotem, K. (1995). The effect of physical attractiveness comparison on choice of partners. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 153-165.
• Sandstrom, M. J. & Cillessen A. H. N. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30 (4), 305–314.
• Sangrador, J. L. & Yela, C. (2000). What is beautiful is loved: Physical attractiveness in love relationships in a representative sample. Social Behavior & Personality, 28, 207-219.
• Shaffer, D. R., Kipp, K., Wood, E. & Willoughby, T. (2010). Developmental Psychology: Childhood and Adolescence (Third Canadian Ed.). Scarborough, ON: Nelson.
• Shaw, J. I. & Skolnick, P. (1973). An investigation of relative preference for consistency motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 271-280. XII
• Sherman, A. M., deVries, B. & Lansford, J. E. (2000). Friendship in childhood and adulthood: Lessons across the life span. Int. J. Aging and Human Development, 51(1), 31-51.
• Vaillancourt, T. & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behaviour, 32, 396-408.
• Vannatta, K., Gartstein, M. A., Zeller, M., & Noll, R. B. (2009). Peer acceptance and social behavior during childhood and adolescence: How important are appearance, athleticism, and academic competence? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(4), 303-311.
• Watling, D. & Banerjee, R. (2007). Children‘s differentiation between ingratiation and self-promotion. Social development, 16 (4), 758-776.
• Wiederman, M. W. & Hurst, S. R. (1997). Physical attractiveness, body image, and women‘s sexual self-schema. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 567-581.
• wikihow (n.d.) How to be popular. Retrieved from Wikihow April 6th 2011 http://www.wikihow.com/Be-Popular
• Wilson, D. W. (1978). Helping behaviour and physical attractiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 313-314.
• W. J. (2009). It‘s high school—with scalpels. JeffreyMD. Retrieved April 16th 2011 from http://www.jeffreymd.com/?s=popular
• Wuensch, K. L. & Moore, C. H. (2004) Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee‘s allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(2), 207-217.